Seismic Performance of Multi-Storey Composite Column Framed Buildings (G+3, G+5 and G+8) with Lead Rubber Bearing Base Isolation Using SAP2000

Authors

  • Kiran Shrikhande Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, India Author
  • Prof. Dipak Gaidhane Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67308/irjist.75

Keywords:

Base Isolation, Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB), Composite Column Structure, Nonlinear Time History Analysis, SAP2000, Base Shear, Storey Drift

Abstract

In earthquake-sensitive areas, especially for multi-storey buildings, structural damage can be severe due to earthquake-induced forces. Base isolation systems, particularly Lead Rubber Bearings (LRBs), have proven effective in enhancing seismic performance by minimizing the transmission of ground motion to the superstructure. In this study, the seismic behaviour of composite column framed buildings with G+3, G+5, and G+8 configurations was analysed using SAP2000 under fixed-base and LRB base-isolated conditions. Three-dimensional numerical models were developed in accordance with IS 1893:2016 and IS 456:2000 and analysed using the Nonlinear Time History Analysis (NLTH) method. Structural response was evaluated in terms of natural time period, storey displacement, inter-storey drift, and base shear. The results showed that the fundamental time period increased significantly with the introduction of LRB isolation, leading to a reduction in seismic force demand. The base-isolated structures reduced base shear by 50.70%, 44.42%, and 29.42% for G+3, G+5, and G+8 buildings, respectively, while maintaining inter-storey drift values within the permissible code limits. Although the flexibility of the isolation system resulted in increased storey displacements, these remained within acceptable performance limits and contributed to enhanced energy dissipation during seismic events. The findings demonstrate that LRB base isolation effectively reduces seismic demand and enhances the seismic performance of composite column buildings, making it a suitable and reliable solution for the design of resilient multi-storey structures in earthquake-prone regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shiming Zhang & Xilin Lu “Multi-level stiffness property and isolating-based design of high damping rubber bearings” 2024 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234339.

[2] C.A. Athira & Ranjith Kolakkattil “A review of progressive collapse of structures under seismic loadings” Structures 2025.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110637.

[3] M. Tamim Tanwer, Prof. (Dr.) Tanveer Ahmed Kazi, Prof. (Dr.) Mayank Desai “Comparative Study on Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing (TFPB) Base Isolation System On G+12 & G+22 Story RCC Structure Over Fixed Based for Indian Subcontinent” International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET) Volume 11, Issue 11, November 2020.

[4] T. Subramani, J. Jothi, M. Kavitha “Earthquake Analysis of Structure by Base Isolation Technique in Sap” Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications Vol. 4, Issue 6(Version 5), June 2014.

[5] A. Di Matteo, C. Masnata, A. Pirrotta “Simplified analytical solution for the optimal design of Tuned Mass Damper Inerter for base isolated structures” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106337

[6] Mahdi Ghasemi, Sayed Behzad Talaeitaba “On the effect of seismic base isolation on seismic design requirements of RC structures” structures, (2020).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.063

[7] Motoki Akazawa, Masahiro Kurata, Shinsuke Yamazaki, Yohsuke Kawamata, Shintaro Matsuo “Test and sensitivity analysis of base-isolated steel frame with low-friction spherical sliding bearings” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2024

[8] Anshul Agrawal, Manvendra Verma, Ajay Kumar “Comparative Analysis of Using Rubber Isolator and Friction Isolator in G+8 Building by SAP 2000” Journal of Polymer & Composites Volume 13, Special Issue 1, 2025

[9] De Domenico, D., Gandelli, E., & Quaglini, V. (2020). “Effective base isolation combining low-friction curved surface sliders and hysteretic gap dampers” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 130, 105989.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105989.

[10] Gudipati Krishnam Naidu, B. Ajitha “Earthquake Analysis For G+20 Using Base Isolation Technique and Sap 2000” Material Science and Technology Vol.22 No.04 April 2023

https://doi.org/10.10543/f0299.2023.41571.

[11] Di Sarno, L., Chioccarelli, E., & Cosenza, E. (2011). Seismic response analysis of an irregular base isolated building. Bulletin of Earth quake Engineering, 9, 1673–1702.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9267-1.

[12] Forcellini, D., & Kalfas, K. N. (2023). Inter-story seismic isolation for high-rise buildings. Engineering Structures, 275 (Part A), 115175.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115175.

[13] Yogesh N. Sonawane, Chetan J. Chitte, Snehal S. Shisode, Prachi S. Kagane “Analysis and Design of Base Isolation for Multi Storied Building Using Lead Rubber Bearing” International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management (IJREAM) 2018.

[14] Rohan G Raikar, Dr. Shivakumaraswamy, Dr. S Vijaya, M. K Darshan “Seismic Analysis of Framed R.C. Structure with Base Isolation Technique using E-Tabs” International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) Volume 4 Issue 5, July-August 2020.

[15] Gambiro, G., Nurjaman, H. N., Dinariana, D., Fau, M. N., Suwito, S., Prijasambada, P., Henni, H., & Sujatini, S. (2023). Design and production of lead rubber bearings for earthquake absorbers. Engineering Heritage Journal, 4(1), 26–37.

https://doi.org/10.26480/gwk.01.2023.26.37.

[16] Shaikh Tabassum Sayyad, Vijaykumar Bhusare “Effectiveness of Base Isolator in High Rise Building for Different Soil Conditions Using Fem” International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) Volume 1, Issue 7 July 2016.

[17] IS 1893 part 1. (2016). Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards.

[18] IS 456. (2000). Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards.

[19] IS 875 part 1 (1987). Indian Standard for Code of practice for design loads for buildings and structures.

[20] IS 875 part 2 (1987). Indian Standard for Code of practice for design loads for buildings and structures.

Downloads

Published

08-06-2026

How to Cite

Seismic Performance of Multi-Storey Composite Column Framed Buildings (G+3, G+5 and G+8) with Lead Rubber Bearing Base Isolation Using SAP2000 . (2026). International Research Journal of Innovation in Science and Technology, 1(2), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.67308/irjist.75

Similar Articles

1-10 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.