Cryogenic and Conventional Cooling Techniques in Machining: A Comparative Study for Sustainable Manufacturing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67308/irjist.060Keywords:
Conventional Cooling, Cutting Temperature, Tool Wear, Surface Roughness, Sustainable Manufacturing, ANOVA, Thermal ManagementAbstract
Machining processes generate substantial heat due to friction and plastic deformation, adversely affecting tool life, surface quality, and dimensional accuracy. Effective cooling strategies are therefore essential for improving machining performance and promoting sustainable manufacturing. This study presents a comparative evaluation of cryogenic and conventional cooling techniques with respect to cutting temperature, tool wear, and surface roughness. The analysis is based on theoretical modelling supported by a simulated experimental dataset developed from trends reported in the literature. Performance was assessed using graphical analysis and statistical validation through analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results demonstrate that cryogenic cooling significantly reduces cutting temperature and tool wear while improving surface finish compared with conventional cooling. Furthermore, the elimination of conventional cutting fluids reduces environmental impact and supports sustainable manufacturing practices. Although cryogenic cooling requires higher initial investment, its advantages in terms of extended tool life, improved machining performance, and reduced ecological footprint make it a promising cooling strategy for modern manufacturing applications.
Downloads
References
[1] M. K. Gupta, M. Mia, G. R. Krolczyk, and P. Nieslony, “A review on the use of cryogenic cooling in machining processes,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2023.
[2] D. Chauhan, M. A. Makhesana, and N. Khanna, “Machining performance of Ti–6Al–4V under cryogenic and dry conditions,” Lubricants, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 493, 2023.
[3] M. E. Korkmaz et al., “State-of-the-art review on cryogenic machining of difficult-to-machine materials,” Materials, vol. 17, no. 4, 2024.
[4] N. S. Ross and R. Rashid, “Enhancement of machining performance using cryogenic cooling techniques,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023.
[5] S. Vijayendra et al., “Comparative study of cryogenic and wet machining in carbon steel,” Cogent Engineering, vol. 12, 2025.
[6] V. Marakini et al., “Comparative analysis of tool wear and surface roughness under cryogenic machining,” 2025.
[7] S. Ranjbar et al., “Effect of cryogenic cooling on machining temperature and tool wear,” Scientific Reports, 2026.
[8] ASME, “Cryogenic cooling in sustainable machining: A review,” Journal of Tribology, vol. 148, 2024.
[9] M. Danish and T. Gupta, “Tool wear behavior under cryogenic and MQL conditions,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2024.
[10] C. Agrawal et al., “Analysis of tool wear and surface roughness in cryogenic machining of titanium alloys,” Tribology International, vol. 153, 2021.
[11] Z. Zhang et al., “Hybrid cryogenic-MQL cooling for sustainable machining,” Processes, vol. 12, 2024.
[12] A. Shokrani, V. Dhokia, and S. T. Newman, “Environmentally conscious machining: Cryogenic cooling applications,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022.
[13] R. Umbrello et al., “Finite element modeling of cryogenic machining processes,” CIRP Annals, vol. 71, 2022.
[14] P. Sartori et al., “Sustainable cooling strategies in machining: A comparative study,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 116, 2023.
[15] Y. Kaynak and I. S. Jawahir, “Cryogenic machining of titanium alloys: Effects on tool life and surface integrity,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2021.
[16] S. B. Patil, M. Patil, K. S. Thakur, R. Pimple, and S. Patil, “AI-Driven Demand Forecasting and Inventory Optimization Using Prophet-Based Time Series Modelling,” International Research Journal of Innovation in Science and Technology (IRJIST), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2026.
[17] K. D. Shrikhande and D. B. Gaidhane, “Seismic Performance of Multi-Storey Composite Column Framed Buildings (G+3, G+5 and G+8) with Lead Rubber Bearing Base Isolation Using SAP2000,” International Research Journal of Innovation in Science and Technology (IRJIST), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 189–200, 2026.
[18] Y. V. Mali and M. D. Patil, “Engineering Approaches to Failure and Safety Assessment in Mechanical Systems,” International Research Journal of Innovation in Science and Technology (IRJIST), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 2026.
[19] S. Mhatre and A. Somatkar, “Risk Analysis and Process Optimization in Toy Manufacturing Using FMEA, Six Sigma, and Statistical Process Control,” International Research Journal of Innovation in Science and Technology (IRJIST), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 39–46, 2026.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rohit Gavali, Siddhodhan Paikrao (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Innovation in Science and Technology (IRJIST) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. Proper attribution to the authors and the journal is required for any reuse of the published content.
